Payments that keep pace with play.

Accept deposits, move payouts, and reconcile transactions through one gaming-ready payment stack.

Payment gateway for gaming transaction network routing deposits, payouts, methods, risk checks, and reconciliation

Designed for qualified gaming businesses

Deposits Payouts Risk signals Reconciliation

A payment gateway for gaming operations

Connect player-facing payment moments to the controls, providers, and records required behind the screen.

  1. PLAYER INTENT

    Start a game purchase, account deposit, subscription, refund, withdrawal, or payout request with a stable reference.

  2. GATEWAY ROUTE

    Apply the approved method, authentication, risk context, and transaction direction without exposing payment credentials to game systems.

  3. PAYMENT EVENT

    Receive signed status changes for pending, approved, failed, settled, refunded, disputed, and paid-out states.

  4. OPERATIONS

    Give support, risk, and finance teams the transaction trail they need for decisions and reconciliation.

Built for both sides of the transaction

Player money can move toward the operator or back to the player. The gateway plan treats each direction on its own terms.

Accept player payments

Design checkout and deposit routes around approved markets, payment methods, account context, authentication, and failure recovery.

PLAYERGATEWAYOPERATOR

Move approved payouts

Coordinate withdrawal or payout requests with operator checks, recipient validation, payout status, and exception handling.

REVIEWPAYOUT RAILPLAYER

The payment state stays visible

A gateway event should help the product, support, risk, and finance teams reach the same answer.

Review integrations
INHosted or API checkout

Create payments with the right merchant, player, order, and method context.

AUTHAuthentication and risk

Coordinate payment authentication and risk signals with operator policies.

EVENTSigned status changes

Process asynchronous events once and recover safely from delays or retries.

OUTPayout and withdrawal states

Separate operator review from payout execution and player communication.

BOOKReconciliation records

Match gaming references, gateway transactions, fees, disputes, and settlement data.

From merchant model to live route

The sequence is ordered because each decision changes the integration that follows.

  1. Qualify the business

    Review ownership, product, jurisdictions, licence position, payment purpose, and forecast.

  2. Map the money

    Document deposits, purchases, refunds, withdrawals, payouts, and ledger ownership.

  3. Build the route

    Implement the approved checkout or API path, webhooks, controls, and reporting.

  4. Test operations

    Exercise failures, retries, disputes, payout exceptions, and reconciliation before launch.

Controls that travel with the payment

Payment security joins request signing, credential handling, notification integrity, risk context, operator policy, and a reviewable transaction record.

Explore security responsibilities
  • Requests signed with a private key, credentials kept server-side
  • Signed webhook verification and replay controls
  • Transaction context for fraud and dispute review
  • Clear ownership of KYC, AML, and player controls

Pricing shaped by the real payment model

Receive commercial terms after the service, markets, methods, volumes, risk profile, payout needs, and integration scope are understood.

See pricing inputs

Business model Markets and currencies Payment methods Volume and risk

Questions before gateway access

Seven answers covering fit, money movement, methods, integration, security, and commercial review.

Request gateway access

What makes a payment gateway suitable for gaming?

Gaming payment flows can combine frequent low-value purchases, stored player balances, subscriptions, deposits, withdrawals, refunds, and prize or creator payouts. A suitable gateway should be reviewed against the actual business model, transaction direction, jurisdictions, payment methods, fraud exposure, and reconciliation workflow. Gambling and wagering models also require a licensing and regulatory review before any commercial approval.

Can the same integration support player deposits and payouts?

A gateway can coordinate both directions when the approved deposit, payout, and banking routes support the merchant model. Deposits and payouts are not identical transactions: they may use different payment rails, verification rules, settlement timings, limits, and status events. The integration plan maps those differences before implementation so the operator can present clear player states and reconcile each movement.

Which gaming businesses can request access?

Game publishers, game marketplaces, subscription platforms, esports services, authorised iGaming operators, online casinos, and licensed sports-betting businesses may request a review. Acceptance is never automatic. Availability depends on the product, country, licence position, ownership, marketing practices, player-fund model, payment purpose, projected volume, and the requirements of regulated payment partners.

Which payment methods can be considered?

The method plan is built from the rails each market actually uses: UPI, PhonePe, Paytm and IMPS in India, bKash, Nagad, Upay and Bangla QR in Bangladesh, JazzCash, Easypaisa, NayaPay and Raast in Pakistan, eSewa and Khalti in Nepal, iPay and PayGo in Sri Lanka, M-Pesa in Kenya, Pix in Brazil. Coverage varies by market and merchant category, and the useful question is not how many logos appear but which routes can be approved, integrated, settled, and supported for the specific player journey.

How can a gaming platform integrate?

Typical routes include a hosted payment page, redirect checkout, server-side API integration, and signed notifications for asynchronous status changes. Both the hosted page and the API need a backend on the merchant side, and withdrawals to players run through the API only. The right route depends on control, compliance scope, release speed, platform architecture, and the need to handle deposits, payouts, refunds, and disputes. Technical review begins after the merchant and payment model are understood.

How are security and compliance responsibilities shared?

The gateway can provide transaction controls, signed notifications the operator verifies server-side, published route availability and limits, CSV reporting, a search request for payments a player says they made, and risk signals. The operator remains responsible for its licences, lawful service, player onboarding, responsible-gaming controls, account security, and internal policies. Exact KYC, AML, data-protection, and monitoring responsibilities are documented for the approved integration.

How is pricing determined?

Commercial terms are prepared after qualification because gaming payment costs depend on the business model, geography, methods, currencies, projected volume, average transaction value, refund and dispute profile, payout needs, and integration scope. The operating model does not apply holds or rolling reserves to merchant funds. The pricing page explains the inputs required for a useful proposal. It does not publish a headline rate that may not apply to the merchant.